Avon vs Randolph
Avon is the unusual case: it has both the stronger schools and the lower price, by about $100k on a 4BR. Unless the commute or the feel of the place decides it for you, Avon is the straightforward pick.
On tax, look past the rate: Randolph works out roughly $1,600 a year cheaper on its own median 4BR.
Choose Avon if you want the stronger schools of the two, or you want the lower price, or the commute matters most.
All Avon numbers →Choose Randolph if you want a train.
All Randolph numbers →Side by side
The better of the two is highlighted on each row. Where a row is not highlighted, the two are close enough that calling a winner would be false precision.
| Avon | Randolph | |
|---|---|---|
| School tier | mixed schoolsT4 | mixed schoolsT4 |
| MCAS percentile | 24th | 11th |
| Niche district rank | — | — |
| 4BR house | $550kT1 | $650kT2 |
| 2BR condo | $315k | $380k |
| Commute to Boston | 44 minT2 | 44 minT2 |
| MBTA rail | No MBTA rail | Commuter rail · ~32 min to terminal |
| Tax rate | $16.50T4 | $11.58T2 |
| Est. tax bill on that 4BR | ≈$9,100 | ≈$7,500 |
| 3BR rent | $3,153/mo | $3,280/mo |
Prices are estimates calibrated to the Zillow Home Value Index and Redfin; tax rates are FY2026 residential rates and the bill applies that rate to the town’s own median 4BR estimate; commutes take the rail leg from the MBTA timetable and still model the drive; rents are HUD FY2026 Small Area Fair Market Rents. School tiers are editorial and shown next to the state’s own MCAS figures. Data last reviewed — see the methodology. This comparison never uses demographics as an input.
